Queer Cinema

Compare how two successfully different popular genres (film noir- Bound and the melodrama - Carol) have been queered.

     Genre should not be thought of as a rigid categorization system, rather as representing ‘’systems of expectation and hypothesis ‘’ which spectators take with them to the cinema (Neale, 1990, p. 158, cited in Stam & Miller). Genre generates excitement and free flowing drama, subsequently producing an emotional connection aligned with the thematic tendencies of film. Genre is constantly changing, but can be classified by a multitude of norms, constructed through mediums such as fashion, speech, lighting or narrative structure. These practices signal to the viewer what is yet to come. The repetition of characteristics may make genre seem ‘’static’’ (Neale, 1990, p. 158, cited in Stam & Miller); however, this is not the case, as genre is a process characterized by diversity; enticing viewers back to the cinema. The hybridity of genres diversifies what we see on screen, mixing and matching cinematic norms to create a wide array of films. Genre is a nineteenth century term, despite the concept being much older; having evolved out of mass-produced fiction (Neale, 1990, cited in Stam & Miller). Prior to this, literature was the common form of popular culture, making film cutting edge and enthralling. 

     Queer cinema offers a critical perspective upon the trajectory of the narrative of film form; offering a reading into the way the film breaks the tradition of genre. The word queer ‘’defies definition’’ (Stacey & Street, 2007, p. 1) by constantly converging against dichotomous labelling systems. Queer theory can be traced back to the 1970s, when it evolved out of poststructuralism and Lancanian psychoanalytic theory. These theories relate to ‘’the sexual subject and the embodiment of desire’’ (Stacey & Street, 2007, p. 1), making queer cinema progressive in terms of representing homosexual desire. Queer theory addresses ‘’a rejection of the biological and essentialist notions of gender and sexuality’’ acknowledging these concepts as ‘’fluid and socially constructed’’ (Dhaenens et al, 2008, p. 340). The term queer has transcended its derogatory roots, moving towards a form of resisting dominant norms. B. Ruby Rich coined the term ‘new queer cinema’ in 1992 as a ‘’style favoring pastiche and appropriation, influenced by art, activism and new entities’’ (Rich, 2013, p. xv). The evolution towards queer cinema created significant discussion surrounding the inclusion and representation of queer narratives, breaking traditional norms such as having two central male protagonists. Henceforth, queer theory attempts to establish gender and sexuality beyond binaries, eliminating hegemonic regulations working to restrict identity categories (Dhaens et al, 2008).  Focusing on inclusivity, queer theory attempts to understand how and why genre influences wider discourse regarding queer narratives. By resisting dominant political hierarchies, and questioning sexed and gendered power relations, the queer analysis of cinema interrogates the process of queer representation as well as the wider impacts of the formal conventions followed.

     The melodrama is not exclusively linked to film; it can be found in theatre and literature rooted in Western culture (Landy, 1991). Melodrama is arguably heightened in times of ideological crisis, grounding the narrative in social issues such as racism, sexism or homophobia. These issues allow the film to clearly label a villain and victim, heightening the polemical style of the genre (Landy, 1991). By tacking social prejudices, the melodrama becomes politically significant, providing a voice to those in oppressed groups in society. Although many melodramas are set in the 1950s, the genre began to emerge in the seventies relating to ‘melodramatic’ modes of theatre, based on passion, crime and family (Cook, 1985). It is worth noting that this presentation of time is idealized, demonstrating what producers in 2019t think the 1950s would have been like. This romanticizes the era, creating a nostalgic representation of history. Women’s film and romantic film are two closely related genres to the melodrama, these sub-themes add to the maternal melodrama, like in the film Carol (Haynes, 2015).

     Contrastingly to 1950s Hollywood melodrama which is classified by ‘’an excessively stylized mise-en-scene'’ (Grant, 2007, p. 11), film noir uses ‘’low key lighting’’ to becomes ‘’a queer thing’’, as it defies definition by remaining mysterious and seductive (Miklitsch, 2014, p.1). Film noir could be considered a style, genre, mood or cycle (Dyer, 1977). Style relating more to ‘’visual motifs,’’ and genre relating more to narrative structures (Miklitsch, 2014). Film noir is not totally defined by any category, but by the ‘’subtle qualities of tone and mood’’ (Schrader, 1972, p. 53). Originating after the second world war in Paris, film noir is an eerie form of ‘’murder melodrama’’ (Naremore, 2008), relying on flashbacks and a surreal ethos enriched with the uncertainty of the unknown. There is no single film noir, a multitude of styles make up the category: ranging from studio noir, to location noir to black noir. This allows for the extravagant expression of genre within the realm of film (Keating, 2010).

     Throughout this essay I plan to use Todd Haynes: Carol (2015) as a 1950s Hollywood melodrama, and the Wachowski’s Bound (1996), constituting film noir to demonstrate how the two genres have been successfully queered. The analysis of queer cinema transcends beyond the screen, representing meaning from dominant discourses surrounding queer representation.  

Queering the Melodrama: Carol

     Carol (Todd Haynes, 2015) is based on the 1952 book The Price of Salt, by the highly regarded lesbian author Patricia Highsmith (White, 2015). The narrative is centered upon a blossoming lesbian romance between (Cate Blanchett as Carol), a white, middle class temptress, and a child-like shop worker (Rooney Mara as Therese). Carol is an unhappy, seductive housewife, who subsequently ‘’pays for her taste of salt’’ (White, 2015, p. 8). Upon their first encounter, Carol prowls around the toy department like a lion watching its prey before eventually pouncing. This ‘’lecherous gaze’’ establishes the predatory nature of their relationship, establishing a ‘’sketchy’’ lesbian ethos (White, 2015, p. 13-14). Carol leaves her expensive gloves behind as an attempt to beguile Therese who is ‘’doe-eyed, callow, and submissive yet watchful’’ (Bradshaw, Cited in The Guardian, 2015). This introductory scene stages the central protagonists as dominant and submissive. Therese’s innocence contrasted to Carol’s flare, signal to the audience that the film is based around their intense romance, despite their character differences in class and age. 

     Carol purchases Therese a camera, enabling her to freeze moments of their shared queer temporality, emphasizing her female gaze. The queering of this melodramatic narrative results in a reversal of the male gaze, commonly found in 1950s Hollywood melodrama where women are presented as passive objects of desire (Mulvey, 1975). Therese’s love for photography allows her a form of agency, able to capture Carol whom ‘’functions as the object of Therese’s gaze’’ (Borden, 2017, p. 93). Still and moving images are portrayed as equally important in communicating the significance of Therese’s view (Merck, 2015). The camera is often obscured by tangible obstacles, such as the curtains blocking Therese’s view during Carol and Harge’s argument, representing the barriers to queer desire in the 1950s with the absence of legal protection for homosexuals. Here, the melodrama is queered as the mise-en-scene is over stylized Therese ironically playing Billie Holiday’s ‘’easy living’’ (White, 2015). Their queer desire is disenabled physically by Harge and symbolically by the curtains signifying distance between them. Haynes positions Therese as an outsider in this scene, her gaze draws attention to their forbidden desires. 

     White (2015) suggests that the viewers are aware of the fate of Carol and Therese’s romance as lesbianism was somewhat forbidden in the 1950s, creating an invisible element to their desire. Their relationship takes place between four walls, this can be contrasted to Jack and Ennis from Brokeback Mountain (Ang Lee, 2005), whom are always in an open outdoor setting. The lesbian desire in Carol is therefore rendered invisible in comparison to Jack and Ennis who are free to express their sexuality to some extent when outside away and from others. Carol paradoxically has restricted freedom, when bound by four walls she is free, yet is still tied to heteronormative ideologies dominating the 1950s, contributing towards the separation of her and her child. The visibility and invisibility of desire is something Haynes toys with throughout the film. Carol and her child’s relationship not often displayed, yet Carol and Therese’s lust is often visible to the viewer through their gaze. Thus, communicating the importance of the female gaze and homosexual desire, contributing to the queering of the melodrama. Through the reversal of the male gaze, the audience are invited to fetishize Therese’s youth, as Carol does. Therese and Carol’s daughter’s visual similarity contributes to the maternal melodrama rooted in the queer narrative. Carol and Therese’s age difference is highlighted when they are intimate for the first time and Carol says ‘’I never looked like that’’, creating a clear separation between the two of them. At this point the narrative switches making Therese the ‘’object of erotic look’’ (Merck, 2015, p. 20).

     The genre of family-based melodrama may feel far removed from film noir; they both however make a political statement regarding the ‘’bourgeois family to the ascendancy and continued dominance of that class’’ (Cook, 1985, p. 74). Carol is very much presented as of a higher class than Therese; her glamorous fur coat, gloves and grand house acts as an insight into her luxurious lifestyle. Carol’s red lips, nails and accessories foreshadow her flirtation. The colour red is often associated with blood and danger, insinuating their love story might not have a happy ending. 

Figure 1. Carol’s class demonstrated through her extravagant costume design. Photo still by Wilson Webb, from Carol © 2015 The Weinstein Company.

       Later, the power dynamic shifts portraying Therese as more glamorous, insinuating her ‘’class mobility’’ (White, 2015, p. 14). The genre of the romantic melodrama has therefore come to represent the social and political struggles of the rigid class divisions of the 1950s. Carol’s upper-class status is contrasted with a clearly enamoured Therese who acknowledges ‘’this furniture, this fabric!’’ in their hotel room (White, 2015, p. 11). Unlike in Todd Haynes’ Far from Heaven (2002), Carol and Therese are not ‘’weighed down with stuff’’ (White, 2015, p.11). The physical locations and material possessions in Carol are branded as meaningless to them, representing romantic loneliness within both protagonists as the emptiness of the filmed locations symbolizes solitude (White, 2015).

     As a stylized film, Carol projects a ‘historical space’ for a lesbian relationship, classified by a clear dichotomy between public and private space relating to the visibility and invisibility of desire (White, 2015, p. 11). Their love is ‘’suspended in time but located in history’’ (White, 2015, p.11); communicated through ‘’aesthetic, temporal, and narrative aspects’’ (Wallace, 2009, p.13). This is demonstrated by how Carol is bound to the domestic sphere, wrapping Christmas gifts with Therese, unable to express her true sexual desire in the confines of heteronormativity. Carol’s entrapment to the family home raises questions about the role taken on by men and women in 1950s Hollywood movies. If stereotypically films set in the 1950s presented a housewife and male breadwinner, Carol disturbs these norms by exploring a lesbian romance (Byars, 1991) . The cameras POV (point of view) contributes towards the viewers perception of each protagonist, creating a clear power dynamic based on the shots from above or below, making the protagonist seem bigger or smaller (Jacobsson, 1999). The film changes narrative perspective, shifting from Therese to Carol as the viewer is encouraged to affiliate with the most vulnerable character; as demonstrated by Carol who is filmed from above while she sits on the floor in figure 1, portraying her as vulnerable and weak. This POV is later repeated in their hotel room (figure 2), demonstrating Carol’s lost agency in a position of diminished power.

Figure 2 & 3 demonstrating Carol (Cate Blanchett) as the vulnerable one as well as the luxury of her items. Photo still by Wilson Webb, from Carol © 2015 The Weinstein Company. 

     Carol as a melodrama has been queered through ‘’twilight images’’ demonstrating ‘’lust and anxiety'', these gestures, glances and a ‘’few, well-chosen words’’ add to the intensity of the queer narrative routed in the melodramatic scenes of sensuality (White, 2015, p. 8). The complex relationship between Carol and Therese is communicated through their shared non-verbal dialogue (Cocozza, cited in The Guardian, 2015). The melodrama has been queered through the stylistic techniques such as the female gaze, not just the characters’ homosexual desires. By using low lighting and shots from the back of the head, the viewer is immersed into the narrative unlike in shot, reverse, shot; a common film technique. This makes the viewer feel as if they are immersed in the interactions, bringing the audience closer to the characters' lives (as shown in figure 4).

Figure 4. The viewer is embodying Therese (Rooney Mara) because the camera angle is from her POV. Photo by Wilson Webb, still taken from Carol © 2015 The Weinstein Company. 

     The temporal setting of the film is at Christmas, thus linking the title Carol to Dicken’s novel: A Christmas Carol (1843). Christmas is branded in America by a typically white, Christian, nuclear family representing heteronormativity. The Price of Salt places emphasis on Therese’s background of abandonment, (as does Dicken’s novel) which is left out of the film. The familial figure of the mother and child are present in Carol, this is however disrupted by Therese and Carol’s sexual desires. Patricia Highsmith, the author of The Price of Salt admits to her own ‘’incestuous attachment to her mother’’ (Merck, 2017, p. 5). This makes the Freudian psychoanalysis of Therese as ‘’the sexually undifferentiated child of the phallic phase’’ convincing; Therese henceforth desires her mother, who in this instance is Carol, acting as her surrogate mother (White, 2015, p. 14). This queer reading positions Therese as childish, dressed in outfits resembling school uniform, making her Carol’s ‘’qusai-daughter’’ (Merk, 2017, p. 2) in a negative Oedipus complex of maternal love. Therese saying yes to everything, is symbolic of Freud’s pleasure principle which incites the notion that we seek pleasure to avoid pain. The pleasure principle drives the id as a form of psychological need (Freud, 1920). When Therese is disgusted by alcohol and asks for hot milk, the viewers are reminded of her abjection as a form of breaking boundaries and disturbing ‘’identity, system and order’’ (Creed, 2015, p.8). 

     The melodrama should be thought of as an expressive code rather than a genre. It is important to question how progressive the narrative of a melodrama is, in order to assess the significance of the piece. Therese and Carol’s romance takes centre stage, overshadowing the melodramatic genre. To a certain extent, their romance is central to the thematic tendencies of the film, not traditional melodramatic characteristics such as a villain and victim, as found in Far From Heaven (Haynes, 2002). 

     Heather Love questions if we must go back in order to move forward for queer representation (2007). The ending of Carol can be read as an ‘’investment in negativity and heartbreak that honors queer history’s losses’’ because their romance could be halted by the negative attitudes of those around them (Love, 2007cited in White, 2015, p. 10). While past queer struggles need to be acknowledged, a positive ending could give viewers hope for the future. The fine line between ‘’productive and paralyzing’’ forms of melancholy contribute towards queer representation on screen (Brown cited in Love, 2007, p. 149). Clinging to the past can be unhelpful in terms of looking forward. It could be suggested that the pleasure in Carol and Therese’s desire, surpasses the boundaries they must overcome because by the end, there is hope for them.

Queering Film Noir: Bound

        Bound (Wachowski, 1996) follows the structure of film noir to create a sexual thriller in which lesbianism is made visible, thus questioning the ‘’patriarchal constructions of women’’ in private and public domains of life (Tasker, 2013, p.354). This structure can be classified by ‘’identifiable aesthetic features’’ (Dyer, 1977, p. 18) such as a traditional film noir mise-en-scene containing ‘’scenes lit for night, rain-drenched streets, doom-laden narration [and] compositional tension rather than action’’ (Cook, 1985, p. 93). In Bound, the noir is queered by the romance of Violet (Jennifer Tilly) and Corky (Gina Gershon) in their cunning fight against the male dominated Mafia. Corky and Violet act as the heroes of the story, on a quest against heteronormativity. 

     Noir is often characterized by the theme of uncertainty, antithetical to traditional family structures and values portrayed in Hollywood melodrama (Dyer, 2004). This uncertainty builds tension throughout the film, especially when viewers attempt to work out if Violet is a ‘real’ lesbian or not (Kraus & Auer, 2000). Alongside this, the uncertain outcome of their battle adds another layer of tension felt by the viewer. This narrative has been successfully queered as typically the femme fatal would lure a willing man into her plan; Bound however replaces this figure with a ‘butch’ lesbian, reversing the gender of key characters (Tasker, 2013). This enables the audience to question how male dominated the film industry is, while also questioning problematic attitudes towards women and individuals in minority groups. 

     Using appropriation and pastiche, Violet and Corky’s lesbian relationship is eroticized, signaling a loss of heterosexuality resulting in a homosexual gaze. Hollywood cinema is fascinated with authentic romances, this eroticizes their desire, destabilizing the gaze by allowing the ‘lesbian look’ to develop ‘’its own subversive dynamic’’ (Kraus & Auer, 2000, p. 190). By presenting Corky and Violet as ‘authentic lesbians’, Bound therefore ‘’dismantles the autonomy of the lesbian look, making it available to the heterosexual spectator’’ (Kraus & Auer, 2000, p. 190), thus questioning the ideology that one can assume sexuality by the appearance of another.

     In the opening scene, Violet, Corky and Caesar are positioned in a triangular shape in the lift. Violet and Corky positioned together, away from Caesar, furthering the queering of the narrative. The dark opening scene of Bound highlights Hollywood's costume differences for men and women by contrasting Violet’s glittery dress with Caesar’s plain black suit. Violet whispers ‘’I want out’’ as the image of Corky’s bound feet appear, representing the desire to escape a world of heteronormativity. The dramatic classical music foreshadows the erotic, fetishized love story entwined in a noir crime story. In the opening scene, the viewer hears Violet whisper ‘’I had this image of you inside of me, like a part of me’’ she then later repeats this to Corky when she says to her ‘’we’re different’’. This difference demonstrates Corky’s acknowledgement of Violet as a fatal femme icon, whose name is one letter away from the word violent. Violet symbolizes queerness, like the violet stripe of the pride flag representing women’s right to vote (Sawer, 2007). The queer relations to her name exhibit the queering of the narrative as violet flowers are closely linked to pansies, destabilizing the homophobic insult (Noble, 1998, p. 4). Her name confirms the suspicions that she is in fact the lesbian noir femme fatal.

     The visual difference between Violet and Corky is a simulacrum of lesbian stereotypes of femme and butch. These categories relate to ‘’forms of social behaviour […] which exploit and manipulate masculine and feminine gender codes and symbols’’ (Rubin, 1992, cited in Morrish & Sauntson, 2007, p. 138). This behaviour communicates gendered identities and desires through performativity. Butler outlined that gender performativity is communicated through the ‘’stylized repetition of acts’’ (Butler, 1998, p. 519). This performativity can be queered, demonstrating lesbian stereotypes which Bound plays on as ‘’co-dependent’’ entities (Morrish & Sauntson, 2007, p. 138). The masculine butch character contrasted with the hyper feminized and sexualised femme. Despite Violet being presented as the femme one, she is still presented as dangerous and intelligent, posing as a threat to ‘’phallic power’’ (Noble, 1998, p. 2). By the end of the film, Violet is recognized as secure in her sexuality, her queered subjectivity acts as a site of privileged identification. Bound uses a ‘’simulacra of film noir’’ to portray Violet’s coming out story as a ‘’queer subject in popular culture (Noble, 1998, p. 3). Violet resists 'the lesbian look’ when she tells Corky ‘’I know what I am, I don’t need it tattooed on my arm’’. These sexuality stereotypes could be oppressing lesbian culture, reducing them to dichotomous male and female ideals. By ‘’perpetuating heteronormative stereotyping’’ the gender and sexuality of Corky and Violet plays contenplates what makes a ‘true’ lesbian, questioning problematic narratives and demonstrating that love has no gender or strict characteristics (Morrish & Sauntson, 2007, p. 138).

Figure 5. Violet (Jennifer Tilly) dressed in low cut lace with a full face of makeup, contrasting to Corky’s Corky (Gina Gershon) messy overalls and vest. Film Still from Bound © Dino De Laurentiis Company.

     The labels femme and butch transcend gender and sexuality, relating to concepts of class, history and age. Corky is presented as working class by her tattoos, ‘’overalls and work boots’’ (Morrish & Sauntson, 2007, p. 150). This is contrasted to Violet whom appears like a 1950s Hollywood star dressed in lace, with a full face of makeup. Violet dropping a teardrop earring down the drain for Corky, paradoxically highlights their class differences by emphasizing Violet’s privilege in contrast to Corky’s manual labor status (Turner, 2018). Despite Violet’s hyper-femininity, she is presented as ‘’powerful, intelligent and active’’ (Morrish & Sauntson, 2007, p. 150). By making the femme character the one who is the ‘’intellectual superior and sexual aggressor’’ (kessler, 2003, p. 18), Bound reverses and questions the characteristics of typical film noir by giving power to Violet. The gaze and the spectacle are separated by the ‘’libidinal lesbian look’’ in Bound (Kraus and Auer, 2000). The binary gender performances therefore perpetuate sexuality stereotypes, whilst also empowering the characters in their fight against the mafia. Violet as a femme is arguably more transgressive than the butch Corky as she is disrupting normative sexuality stereotypes, she is aware of her gender performance, she uses it to be subversive towards heteronormative attitudes labelling butch as lesbian (Morrish & Sauntson, 2007). Corky has her coffee black, drives a Chevrolet truck and has been too prison for five years, these factors all add to the dark mystery of her perceived ‘butch’ persona. Similarly, Violet has been with Caesar and has therefore been associated with the mafia for five years as ‘’part of the business’’, complying in the exclusively male mob life. These five years in both instances, reiterate the extent to which they are both bounded to heterosocial spaces (Noble, 1998, p. 5). Corky and Violets class differences are highlighted by the spatial contrast in the setting in which they are both presented. Corky is living in an empty non-glamorous apartment with a single seductive red wall; whereas Violet is in an extravagantly decorated apartment. Their love and trust for each other is communicated non-verbally, through the camera angles panning over both apartments', demonstrating their unitedness through the one wall that separates them (Turner, 2018). 

     The sex scenes in Bound could relate to both homo and heterosexual audiences as the slow panning camera angles from above, as well as the softer shots of eroticism symbolize a less graphic form of lust and desire (Kessler, 2003).  This lust is based upon emotion and feeling, rather than appeasing the male gaze, like when mainstream lesbian sex scenes include ‘’long hair, long nails and a man waiting close by’’ (Kessler, 2003, p. 14). Bound subverted these norms, making this noir successfully queered. The camera does not invite the viewer to identify with either Violet or Corky; rather the camera is looking in at the action from above, neutralizing an act which is often fetishized on screen. Bodies however are eroticized in Bound; this is evident in the extreme close-up shots of body parts such as Violet’s bare legs or Corky’s tattoos. The sex scene avoids phallocentric shots by focusing more on Violet’s face during her time of pleasure, rather than on the actual penetration as a heterosexual film might (Kessler, 2003). The film still uses fetishistic scopophilia to present the queer romance, as demonstrated by their genuine and intimate romanticism; often found to be exaggerated in heterosexual love scenes. Their erotic desire positions Violet and Corky as spectacles, lingering the camera above them, inviting both male and female audiences to relate to their beauty and desires as universal.

     Corky uses her jewellery to open the briefcase filled with Caesar’s money, ironically one of the few femme things about her is used to defeat the male orientated mafia. Caesar demonstrates homophobic views when he says ‘’fucking queers, they make me sick’’. This creates a heteronormative space in which Corky and Violet are both bound too as it is ‘’all part of the business’’. Traditionally for film noir, the central protagonists are forced to ‘’stare the lie of the American dream in the face’’ when their crime ends in bloodshed (Turner, 2018, p.1). The Wachowskis’ however successfully queer this narrative by scripting Violet and Corky a beautiful pastiche of an escape. They drive away into the sunset to the sound of Tom Jones ‘’she’s a lady’’. This dark use of comedy incites the queering of film noir, as Violet and Corky have played their femininity to their advantage, gaining ultimate freedom. 

Queer Comparison: The Melodrama & Film Noir

     Carol and Bound’s opening scenes both begin with a bounded object: Carol opening with the image of a metal gate, representing the limits to their sexual freedom in a rigid world of stigmatized views (such as those of Caesar). Bound’s opening scene shows Corky tied up, bound to the heterosexual world she is confined within. After the metal gate and opening credits, Carol begins with a man interrupting Carol and Therese’s meal. Similarly, after seeing Corky tied up, Bound shows Caesar imposing on Corky and Violets expressive eye contact in their first encounter in an elevator. In both scenarios the dramatic genres are used to convey the initial same sex desire, halted by the presence of a male figure. On a larger scale, this could come to demonstrate that in a patriarchal society, homosexual desire between women needs to be normalized, to allow for the free-flowing expression of desire with no obstructions.

       Film noir is visually darker than technicolor 1950s Hollywood melodrama; they both however start with dramatic classical music to build tension from the onset. This effect enhances ‘’the sense of depth by separating the foreground from the background’’ (Keating, 2010, p. 203). This is particularly evident at the end of the film when the power dynamic switches to the newly glamourized Therese, whom is in sight of Carol through her blurred taxi window. The colours in the scene are heightened and the camera focus is on Therese, despite the physical boundary of Carol’s dirty taxi window. The repetition of Carols red nails, red lips and other red items of clothing symbolizes her passion, sexuality and danger. Film noir employs a similar technique, painting Violet with black nails to convey the dark, seductive mystery of her character (White, 2015). Violets makeup, hair and style is reminiscent of 1950s Hollywood glamour like Carol who dresses equally as luxurious, although slightly more reserved. Carol and Violet are also portrayed in the same light when they both use smoking as a femme elegant action.

     The power dynamic in Bound shifts from the male to female characters when Corky and Violet plot their crime. Both films contain a ‘crime’, Carol and Therese’s being their escape together. In both films the male characters are the obstacle obscuring the women's happiness. In this sense, both film noir and melodrama have been queered as the threat to happiness is usually another woman, not the male figure. Richard Dyer suggested that the melodrama is threatened when women or homosexuals are the intellectual figures (2008). In this case, film noir and the melodrama have been queered through the reversal of the central protagonists’ power.

     Interpreting a 1950s or 1990s lesbian romance in America historicizes the disruption of the idealized straight, white American dream often explored in Hollywood films such as Of Mice and Men (1992) and Brokeback Mountain (2005). Peele (2007) suggested that there is a new form of queer cinema which is bound to the ‘’white trash’’ identity of ‘’drifters and hustlers who use the road to move […] through the romanticized American landscape’’ (p. 168). Viewing these characters as not rooted to one place, rather as having ‘’restless identities’’ (Peele, 2007, p. 168). In both films, the protagonists’ use the road to escape dominant culture and achieve happiness through their new found freedom. Bound ends with Violet and Corky, (both in blacked out sunglasses to suit the noir) driving away into the sunset ready to hit the road and face their new lives together. Similarly, Carol includes a road trip when she and Therese embark on an American road trip. Both films exhibit ‘’the postwar phenomena’’ of the ‘’automobile as a fundamental expression of individuality’’ (Laderman, 1996, p. 41). The isolation of the car and the road enables queer desire with no judgement or oppression. This voyaging ‘’reflects an ideology of expansionism’’ thus resulting in the spread of acceptance of queer desire. Film noir and melodrama have similarly been queered through the ‘’meandering quality of the narrative’’ (Laderman, 1996, p. 42), as well as forms of escapism and voyeurism which resulted from the protagonists’ queer desires to love freely.

     Films centered around a road or moving narrative such as Thelma and Louise (1991), use female protagonists to make a statement in a male dominated industry by highlighting ‘’ideological struggles’’ of social conflict (Kotsopoulos, 2003, p. 11). By addressing escapism and the lack of freedom, Thelma and Louise is a hybrid film, mixing genres of noir, a road movie and the women's film. Bound and Carol can both be compared to Thelma and Louise in the way that these films all address the oppressive nature of the law regarding homosexual marriage. All three films have two female central protagonists, one in an unhappy relationship, and the other single, reflecting the changing status of marriage in post-war America (Collins et al, 1993). The male figure is presented in a negative light in all films in discussion, allowing the female stars a form of ‘’feminine revenge fantasy’’ (Collins et al, 1993, p. 137). Many queer narratives have been called problematic for enforcing harmful stereotypes (Raymond, 2003). Tragic narratives commonly sanction queer characters ‘’who deviate from […] codes of normative sexual desire’’ (Goltz, 2009, p. 15). The hope left for Violet, Corky, Carol and Therese is a symbolic win for queer representation on screen as what happens in film transcends this and is taken as a form of reality (Aitken & Zonn, 1994). Considering film noir is based around tension and crime, Corky and Violet are committing a crime, the viewer is however invited to sympathize with them in support of their romance.

     Films are often rooted in fiction, despite this; they resonate with viewers by demonstrating the modes of discourse often seen in ‘real’ life in which the audience can relate (Morrish & Sauntson, 2007). The norm breaking narratives of Carol and Bound can be used to show how the melodrama and film noir are queered by resisting dominant power relations. Queering cinema is more than writing about films with homosexual characters. These films represent anti-normativity in the way that they both resisted heteronormative stereotypes, producing cutting-edge narratives, actively questioning gender, sexuality and culture. Both films interrogate the idea that ‘homosexuals [and lesbians] are a ‘particular type of person’ (Dyer, cited in Benshoff & Griffin, 2004, p. 94). By demonstrating that gender and sexuality have no absolutes, the fluidity of these concepts are made visible. Unusually for queer cinema, both films could be suggested to end leaving the viewer with a form of hope. Despite having a happy ending, Bound still uses the concept of crime, positioning the lesbian lovers as ‘’deviant threats to the social order’’ (Kessler, 2003, p. 13). Is it culturally damaging to portray lesbians in this way? I would argue not. Bound uses film noir to empower the queer characters, allowing them the freedom to control their own fate.

     The uncertainty of both endings in question leave the viewer with a ‘’tantalizing taste of the past and glimpse of queer futures’’ (White, 2015, p. 17). The taste of the past is presented as a bitter sweet phenomenon with hope for the future. By depicting romance as more important than family, both texts cause the audience great pleasure in doing so (Merck, 2017). The genres of both Bound and Carol have been successfully queered by the presentation of a lesbian romance which disturbs Hollywood norms. The dark ethos of the noir contributes towards Violet and Corky’s anti-patriarchal fight. Both genres use thematic tendencies such as narrative, lighting and camera angles to demonstrate how progressive lesbian representation can be on screen (Merck, 2017).

     Bound and Carol as noir and melodrama have therefore acted as artful examples of how genre can be queered. The queering of cinema seeks to explore media representations of homosexual desire and push boundaries outside of ‘the norm’. This is vital to understand as the media acts as a form of dominant discourse, influencing how queer identities are understood and interpreted in the ‘real’ world. Through camera angles, lighting, and other characteristics of genre demonstrated in this essay, both films represent anti-normativity challenging hegemonic forms of power. As a result of these successful queer narratives, I hope Hollywood will begin to become more inclusive, allowing for the significant depiction of many minority groups.

Bibliography

Atiken, S., & Zonn, L. (1994). Place, Power, Situation and Spectacle: A Geography of Film. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc: Maryland: USA.

Borden, D. (2017). Queering the Weepie: Todd Haynes and the Object in/of Carol. For Da: Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Vol. 1, pp. 93-98.

Bradshaw, P. (2015). Carol review – Cate Blanchett superb in a five-star tale of forbidden love. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/nov/26/carol-film-review-cate-blanchett-todd-haynes-rooney-mara. Last accessed 16/04/2019.

Butler, J. (1988). Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory. Theatre Journal, Vol. 40, (4), pp. 519-531.

Byars, J. (1991). All that Hollywood Allows: Re-reading Gender in 1950s Melodrama. University of North Carolina Press.

Cocozza, P. (2015). How Patricia Highsmith's Carol became a film: 'Lesbianism is not an issue. It's a state of normal'. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/nov/12/how-patricia-highsmiths-carol-became-a-film-lesbianism-is-not-an-issue. Last accessed 16/04/2019.

Collins, J., & Collins, P, A., & Radner, H. (1993). Film Theory Goes to the Movies: Cultural Analysis of Contemporary Film. Routledge: New York.

Cook, P. (1985). The Cinema Book. British Film Institute: London.

Creed, B. (2015). The monstrous-feminine: Film, feminism, psychoanalysis. Routledge: Oxon.

Dean, T. (2003). Lacan and queer theory. The Cambridge Companion to Lacan, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, pp. 238-52.

Dhaenens, F., & Bauwel, S., & Biltereyst, D. (2008). Slashing the Fiction of Queer Theory. Slash Fiction, Queer Reading, and Transgressing the Boundaries of Screen Studies, Representations, and Audiences. Journal of Communication Inquiry. Vol. 32, (4), pp. 335-347.

Doanne, M, A. (1982). Film and the Masquerade: Theorizing the Female Spectator. Screen, Vol. 23, (3-4), pp. 74-88.

Dyer, R. (1977). Homosexuality and Film Noir. Jump Cult: A Review of Contemporary Media, Vol. 16, pp.18-21.

Dyer, R. (2004). Queer Noir. In Queer Cinema, The Film Reader. Ed Benshoff, H., & Griffin, S. Routledge: New York.

Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the Pleasure Principle. The International Psycho-Analytical Library. Ed Ernest Jones. Translation from the second German Edition by Hubback. (4), pp. 1-55.

Goltz, D. B. (2009). Queer temporalities in gay male representation: Tragedy, normativity, and futurity. Routledge: New York.

Grant, B.K., (2007). Film genre: From iconography to ideology (Vol. 33). Wallflower Press: London.

Jacobsson, E.M. (1999). A Female Gaze? Kungl Tekniska Hogskloan: Royal Insitute of Technology, Sweden. [ONLINE] Found at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=433F293D61D976C6ACE02561D8226105?doi=10.1.1.29.2891&rep=rep1&type=pdf Last accessed 23.04.19.

Keating, R. (2010). Hollywood Lighting from the Silent Era to Film Noir. Colombia University Press: New York.

Kessler, K. (2003). Bound together. FILM QUART, Vol. 56, (4), pp. 13-22.

Kotsopoulos, A. (2003). Gendering Expectations: Genre and Allegory in Readings of Thelma and Louise. Left History. Vol. 8, (2), pp. 10-38.

Kraus, E., & Auer, C. (2000). Simulacrum America: The USA and Popular Media. Camden House: Suffolk.

Laderman, D. (1996). What a Trip: The Road Film and American Culture. Journal of Film and Video. Vol. 48, (½), pp. 41-57.

Landy, M. (1991). Imitations of Life: A Reader on Film & Television Melodrama. Wayne State University Press: Michigan.

Love, H. (2007) Epilogue: The politics of refusal. From Feeling backward: loss and the politics of queer history, Harvard University Press: Cambridge. pp. 146-163

Merck, M. (2017). Negative Oedipus: Carol as Lesbian Romance and Maternal Melodrama Sequence: Serial Studies. Media, Film and Music, Vol. 2, (3), pp. 1-37.

Miklitsch, R. (2014). Kiss the blood off my hands: On classic film noir. University of Illinois Press: Chicago.

Morrish, L., & Sauntson, H. (2007). New Perspectives on Language and Sexual Identity, Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema In: Visual and Other Pleasures. Language, Discourse, Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Naremore, J., (2008). More than night: Film noir in its contexts. University of California Press: London.

Neale, S. (1990). Questions of genre, Chapter 10, (pp. 156-78), in Film and Theory: An Anthology. Eds Stam, R & Miller, T. Blackwell Publishers: New York.

Noble, J. (1998). “‘Bound’ and Invested: Lesbian Desire and Hollywood Ethnography.” Film Criticism, vol. 22, (3), pp. 1–21. 

Peele, T. (2007). Queer Popular Culture: Literature, Media, Film and Television. Palgrave Macmillan: Hampshire.

Raymond, D. (2003). Popular Culture and Queer Representation. A Critical Perspective, pp. 98-110.

Rich, B.R. (2013). New queer cinema: The director’s cut. Duke University Press: London.

Sawer, M. (2007). Wearing your politics on your sleeve: The role of political colours in social movements. Social Movement Studies, Vol. 6, (1), pp. 39-56.

Schrader, P. (1972). Notes on Film Noir. Film Comment, Vol.8, (1), pp. 53-62.

Stacey, J., & Street, S. (2007). Queer Screen, Routledge: Oxon. 

Tasker, Y. (2013). Women in film noir. In A Companion to Film Noir, (eds A. Spicer and H. Hanson), pp. 353-368.

Turner, K. (2018). Define Frenzy: Queering Film Noir in Bound. Paste Magazine [online]. Last Accessed 03/05/19. Available at: https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2018/06/define-frenzy-queering-film-noir-in-bound.html

Wallace, L. (2009). Lesbianism, Cinema, Space: The Sexual Life of Apartments. Routledge: New York.

White, P. (2015). Sketchy lesbians: Carol as history and fantasy. FILM QUART, Vol. 69, (2), pp. 8-18.

Filmography

Bound. 1996 [film] Lana and Lilly Wachowski. Dir. USA: Dino De Laurentiis Company.

Brokeback Mountain. 2005 [film] Ang Lee. Dir. USA: Focus Theatres.

Carol. 2015 [film] Todd Haynes. Dir. USA: The Weinstein Company.

Far From Heaven. 2002 [film] Todd Haynes. Dir. USA: Focus Theatres.

Thelma and Louise. 1991 [film] Ridley Scott. Dir. USA: Pathe Entertainment.

Word Count: 5,603